Chess Game: Pseudonym vs. peary moppins — 0-1
At your command. Go to it!
Date: November 8, 2009
Categories: Chess, Games completed
Comments RSS TrackBack 45 comments
-
1
Pseudonym
in November 8th, 2009 @ 11:04I hate going first, I’m never quite sure of what to do. Was that an okay move?
0
0
-
2
peary moppins
in November 8th, 2009 @ 11:09I think so!
0
0
-
3
Pseudonym
in November 10th, 2009 @ 18:23Um, peary moppins? I believe it’s your turn? Sorry, I know I’m impatient.
0
0
-
4
peary moppins
in November 10th, 2009 @ 19:06Sorry Pseudo! I had rehearsal.
0
0
-
4.1
Pseudonym
in November 10th, 2009 @ 19:47It’s totally fine! I’m just excessively impatient.
0
0
-
5
Pseudonym
in November 11th, 2009 @ 20:13I’m a horrible chess player…you might have noticed. I don’t play much. The last game I played resulted in Keiffer stealing all the other player’s pieces…this illustrates my chess career pretty well.
0
0
-
6
bubblebabe225
in November 12th, 2009 @ 18:22Ha. Nice. Laughing out loud. Nice avatar, Pseudo.
0
0
-
7
peary moppins
in November 13th, 2009 @ 09:46Hahaha, you’re not bad. I tried this “chess club” thing last year and got defeated by a third grader
I think this is a check…i think the one with the spikes is a king. I hope its a king.
0
0
-
8
peary moppins
in November 13th, 2009 @ 09:49OH NO ITS A QUEEN.
Ugh.
[expletive]
Never mind about the check thingy…wAit. If thats a queen….you can…oh, cake.
0
0
-
9
Robert Coontz (Administrator)
in November 13th, 2009 @ 10:33peary,
I’ll erase your move this once. Mistaking a queen for a king is pretty fundamental.
0
0
-
9.1
mas0n
in November 13th, 2009 @ 16:11Not only that, but a little….. umm…….. in nice terms………. special…….or not bright….
0
0
-
9.2
peary moppins
in November 15th, 2009 @ 18:59THANK YOU ROBERT!
0
0
-
10
peary moppins / Fatima
in December 15th, 2009 @ 18:56Psuedo??
0
0
-
10.1
Pseudonym
in December 27th, 2009 @ 10:42Sorry…I was kicked off the Internet for a while.
0
0
-
11
Pseudonym
in January 3rd, 2010 @ 13:20Do we announce it when the other person’s in check? (Which I don’t think you are, by the way.)
0
0
-
12
peary moppins
in January 3rd, 2010 @ 14:15I think so.
augh. I have lost both of my knights.
0
0
-
12.1
Robert Coontz (Administrator)
in January 4th, 2010 @ 12:30peary: But you have both of your bishops. That’s good. Bishops are usually slightly stronger than knights, especially if two of them work together.
0
0
-
13
Pseudonym
in January 12th, 2010 @ 21:00I just realized that I spent a lot of time chasing that bishop. Oh well.
0
0
-
14
Robert Coontz (Administrator)
in January 17th, 2010 @ 16:12(After 24. Ra2…)
peary is playing very aggressively. This is an exciting position!
0
0
-
15
peary moppins
in January 18th, 2010 @ 20:00*cackles evilly*
0
0
-
16
peary moppins
in January 18th, 2010 @ 20:05Oh noes.
I can’t seem to remember my battle plan!
*squints at chessboard*
0
0
-
17
peary moppins
in January 18th, 2010 @ 20:13I believe that’s a check…
I’m not sure if that was the right move, but all the other moves I thought of seemed to result in my bishops being killed/eaten/taken.
Hmm…are chess pieces cannibalistic?
*ponders*
Well, in Harry Potter I think they are smashed…
0
0
-
18
Robert Coontz (Administrator)
in January 18th, 2010 @ 20:17There’s an idea: edible chess sets! That could result in some extremely active games.
0
0
-
18.1
Pseudonym
in January 19th, 2010 @ 19:27“Active games.” That probably has a different definition for Keiffer and me than most people.
0
0
-
19
peary moppins
in January 19th, 2010 @ 17:28Heehee…
*sneaks a chocolate pawn into her mouth*
0
0
-
20
Robert Coontz (Administrator)
in January 19th, 2010 @ 17:40It’s Pseudonym’s turn to move.
0
0
-
21
Pseudonym
in January 19th, 2010 @ 19:28I somehow get the feeling that was a very, very bad move. *sigh*
0
0
-
22
peary moppins
in January 22nd, 2010 @ 15:17No, it’s not bad…at least right now I can do nothing to your king.
Ahh, those pawns are bothering me.
0
0
-
23
peary moppins
in January 27th, 2010 @ 16:23If only a queen could jump like a knight.
0
0
-
24
Pseudonym
in January 28th, 2010 @ 17:02That was check, wasn’t it?
0
0
-
24.1
Robert Coontz (Administrator)
in January 28th, 2010 @ 17:22If you’re talking about Black’s 28th move, Qb5+, yes, it was check. (The plus sign means check in this kind of chess notation.)
0
0
-
25
peary moppins
in January 30th, 2010 @ 15:30Ugh. This move requires some more thought….
0
0
-
26
Pseudonym
in January 30th, 2010 @ 15:39Hm, I feel like that was a trap, but I don’t see how it could be….
0
0
-
27
peary moppins
in January 31st, 2010 @ 12:35Oh cake. I did not see that coming.
*thinks*.
OK, I believe thats a check.
0
0
-
28
peary moppins
in February 2nd, 2010 @ 15:49GAAAAH!
Im not sure if I should really think about this or just eat everything in sight.
0
0
-
28.1
Robert Coontz (Administrator)
in February 2nd, 2010 @ 16:22If you don’t think at least a little, you’re more likely to throw everything away.
0
0
-
29
Pseudonym
in February 5th, 2010 @ 16:13Check?
0
0
-
30
peary moppins
in February 9th, 2010 @ 16:47Oh god. I have a bad feeling about this.
0
0
-
31
peary moppins
in February 9th, 2010 @ 20:05That’s weird…I could’ve sworn I’d just moved.
0
0
-
32
peary moppins
in February 9th, 2010 @ 20:08Check.
0
0
-
33
Pseudonym
in February 10th, 2010 @ 18:51Hm….weird. I don’t recall having this few pieces. *bad memory*
0
0
-
34
peary moppins
in February 11th, 2010 @ 16:42Hahaha, same. My “army” has been reduced to a few pawns, a king and queen and rooks. Oh, and a lone bishop!
I find it kinda amusing how we’ve been playing for 4 months.
0
0
-
34.1
Pseudonym
in February 12th, 2010 @ 15:00Four months?!
Wow, that’s a long time.
0
0
-
35
peary moppins
in February 12th, 2010 @ 16:0034.1) Yup!
I think thats a wrap then.
Good game, Pseudo!
0
0
-
35.1
Pseudonym
in February 13th, 2010 @ 09:03You too. Good job!
0
0
