MuseBlog Chess Ladder

This is where we’ll keep track of all MuseBlog Chess Ratings, with separate “ladders” for standard chess and the two chess variants played on the blog. We’ll update the list at the end of each game. (Please remind us if we don’t.)

Last updated: 25 June 2010

STANDARD CHESS

260
bookgirl_me (3)
160
cromwell (3)
150
peary_moppins (1), Purple Panda (1), Piggy (4)
140
Ducky (3)
100
Keiffer (1), and anyone who is just starting out and hasn’t finished a game yet
90
SudoRandom (1), muselover (1)
50
mas0n (1), TMFA (1), RoseQuartz (1), Tesseract (1), Pseudonym (1), Jakob Wonkychair (4)
10
Kiga (1)

CAPABLANCA CHESS

150
bookgirl_me (1), cromwell (1)
50
Enceladus (1), POSOC (1)

TURBO CHESS

150
bookgirl_me (1)
50
Jakob Wonkychair (1)

(Numbers in parentheses indicate total number of games completed.)

49 thoughts on “MuseBlog Chess Ladder”

  1. Anyone who hasn’t played here before starts out with 100 points, but knowing whether you consider yourself an A, B, or C player would help in matching you with a partner for a game. Pseudonym is a C. Gimanator isn’t sure. oxlin hasn’t specified. Piggy prefers someone with points (presumably, more than 100). So, information, please.

    Pie 0
    Squid 0
          1. I’m rated 140 because of luck, and my rating would be a lot lower if I’d finished all my chess games. My dad beats me at chess on a regular basis, and I tend to mindlessly blunder, so you might be able to beat me.

            Pie 0
            Squid 0
  2. Update: Jakob Wonkychair is now tied with Piggy at the top of the ladder, with 160 points. Unless bookgirl_me’s game with cromwell ends in a draw, however, one of them will end up with 200 points.

    It’s interesting to watch the ratings rise and fall and the points accumulate. Under the system, the total number of points among all players stays the same, i.e., 100 times the number of players. The total will increase slightly if some lower-rated players lose more games, because negative ratings are rounded up to zero.

    Pie 0
    Squid 0
        1. Her rating is more than 40 points below yours, so you round it up to your rating minus 40, or 220. Then you subtract 50 points from that, for 170.

          If Tess were to win, her rating would rise from 50 to (50+40)+50, or 140.

          Right now, your rating is so high that any victory will gain you only 10 points, whereas any loss will cost you 90.

          Pie 0
          Squid 0
          1. Ah *forgot the bit about rounding up*

            I’ll play her anyway, if she wants. I’d also love to have another go at turbo or capablanca chess if someone wants to play me.

            Pie 0
            Squid 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *